폰테크 후기, 폰테크, 폰테크당일 당일폰테크

Senate Bill 53, the landmark AI transparency bill that has divided AI companies and made headlines for months, is now officially law in California. 

On Monday, California governor Gavin Newsom signed the “Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act,” which was authored by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco). It’s the second draft of such a bill, as Newsom vetoed the first version — SB 1047 — last year due to concerns it was too strict and could stifle AI innovation in the state. It would have required all AI developers, especially makers of models with training costs of $100 million or more, to test for specific risks. After the veto, Newsom tasked AI researchers with coming up with an alternative, which was published in the form of a 52-page report — and formed the basis of SB 53. 

Some of the researchers’ recommendations made it into SB 53, like requiring large AI companies to reveal their safety and security processes, allowing for whistleblower protections for employees at AI companies, and sharing information directly with the public for transparency purposes. But some aspects didn’t make it into the report — like third-party evaluations. 

As part of the bill, large AI developers will need to “publicly publish a framework on [their] website describing how the company has incorporated national standards, international standards, and industry-consensus best practices into its frontier AI framework,” per a release. Any large AI developer that makes an update to its safety and security protocol will also need to publish the update, and its reasoning for it, within 30 days. But it’s worth noting this part isn’t necessarily a win for AI whistleblowers and proponents of regulation. Many AI companies that lobby against regulation propose voluntary frameworks and best practices — which can be seen guidelines rather than rules, with few, if any, penalties attached. 

The bill does create a new way for both AI companies and members of the public to “report potential critical safety incidents to California’s Office of Emergency Services,” per the release, and “protects whistleblowers who disclose significant health and safety risks posed by frontier models, and creates a civil penalty for noncompliance, enforceable by the Attorney General’s office.” The release also said that the California Department of Technology would recommend updates to the law every year “based on multistakeholder input, technological developments, and international standards.”

AI companies were divided on SB 53, though most were initially either publicly or privately against the bill, saying it would drive companies out of California. They knew the stakes: With nearly 40 million residents of California and a handful of AI hubs, the state has outsized influence on the AI industry and how it will be regulated. 

SB 53 had been publicly endorsed by Anthropic after weeks of negotiations on the bill’s wording, but Meta in August launched a state-level super PAC to help shape AI legislation in California. And OpenAI had lobbied against such legislation in August, with its chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane writing to Newsom that “California’s leadership in technology regulation is most effective when it complements effective global and federal safety ecosystems.” 

Lehane suggested that AI companies should be able to get around California state requirements by signing onto federal or global agreements instead, writing, “In order to make California a leader in global, national and state-level AI policy, we encourage the state to consider frontier model developers compliant with its state requirements when they sign onto a parallel regulatory framework like the [EU Code of Practice] or enter into a safety-oriented agreement with a relevant US federal government agency.”

 Senate Bill 53, the landmark AI transparency bill that has divided AI companies and made headlines for months, is now officially law in California.  On Monday, California governor Gavin Newsom signed the “Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act,” which was authored by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco). It’s the second draft of such a bill, AI, News, Policy 폰테크 달인은 복잡한 용어 대신 이해하기 쉬운 설명과 투명한 절차로 상담부터 입금까지 전 과정을 깔끔하게 안내합니다. 합리적인 시세 기준으로 모델·상태별 견적을 제시하고, 불필요한 수수료나 숨은 비용은 없습니다. 폰테크가 처음이신 분도 안전하게 진행하시도록 신원 확인·안전결제·개인정보 보호 원칙을 지킵니다. 채널 상담, 방문 상담, 비대면 상담까지 상황에 맞춰 연결되며, 진행 여부는 고객이 결정합니다. 폰테크 달인은 결과만큼 과정의 신뢰를 중요하게 생각합니다. 당일 문의·당일 진행을 목표로 있지만, 무리한 권유 없이 조건이 맞을 때만 안내합니다. 진행 후에는 간단한 체크리스트와 거래 내역을 제공해 재확인할 수 있고, 사후 문의도 응답합니다. 합리, 안전, 투명—폰테크 달인의 기준입니다. 온라인 접수로 상담을 시작할 수 있으며, 자주 묻는 질문을 통해 폰테크 전 과정을 미리 확인하실 수 있습니다. 처음부터 끝까지 ‘내가 이해한 만큼만 진행’하는 곳, 그게 폰테크 달인입니다. #폰테크 #폰테크당일 #당일폰테크 #비대면폰테크 https://phonetech.store/

답글 남기기

전화상담  카카오톡상담